Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the agencia zoosk damas silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Slimming down restraint is mentioned of the Dieting Level of Food Attitudes Take to (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), made up of sixteen comments scored with the a great six-section size (never ever = 0/usually = 5), having large ratings showing a higher level regarding controlled eating. Toward Eat psychometrical features come across Garner ainsi que al. (1982). Brand new structure coefficient for both trials, brand new Mexican and German of these, was of the identical worthy of, a leader away from 0.76.
Losing weight discipline
Ineffectiveness size. The newest bad connect with foundation is actually projected from Ineffectiveness Scale out of the Restaurants Disorders List (EDI) (Gather mais aussi al., 1983), which has shown a good convergent authenticity (ineffectiveness/self-confidence ) of R = 0.70 (p
Medical teams got the weight and you will level measures
Body mass index (BMI). Bmi is actually computed once the lbs from inside the kilograms divided from the top in rectangular meters (Body mass index = kg/m2).
In advance of investigation collection, good airplane pilot examination of the brand new Silhouettes Measure (Figure 1), used on a sample consisting of 20 Mexican pupils, was applied to check the new appropriateness of the figures so you can show looks systems, so you can corroborate a beneficial acceptation out of an as yet not known number of silhouettes and a clear knowledge of the fresh new advice (the fresh new German class already measured having study within value). The results demonstrated this new Silhouette Level are an excellent otherwise an compatible means towards the North american country try.
The fresh new detectives of the two nations, during the Mexico Town as well as Hae (standardized) techniques. Brand new forms was basically used on sets of medical and breastfeeding students at North american country and German universities. One reason why at the rear of the new ples away from youngsters regarding medication is precisely the notice one (it’s possible to suppose) these types of young adults must have towards the scientific field as well as health issues, leading them to a whole lot more responsive to issues instance ED. Advised agree is taken from the data people. Every called people accessible to engage. The fresh respective regional ethics committees acknowledged this new non-invasive techniques. Elite translators undertook and you will controlled this new translation and you can retranslation of your tools.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for