First of all captures the attention ‘s the comparatively slim and you will tall way new characters is actually written. The newest streaks of your ?, eg, are so small one to lined up ten Roberts checks out a good ? rather than an enthusiastic ?. Despite the uncial handwriting, the latest ? is not written eg a capital Latin “M”, but rather is much like a few adjacent “1”s into the Latin cursive; this new crossbar of ? is in the higher third of the fresh new page. The fresh new ?, for instance the ?, is very peculiar and you will corresponds to an excellent Latin “V”, as the ? represents an upside-down “V”; the usual expansion of correct diagonal to reach the top remaining cannot happen. The new ? include a few separate bits. There was a noticeable pit between your vertical downstroke additionally the one or two diagonals, that are used one to sweep. This form of this new ? is available, instance, within the a beneficial psalm fragment regarding first 1 / 2 of the eighth century, P.Amst. I 21 fourteen . The fresh crossbar of one’s ? composed very high up is also found in a great liturgical schedule regarding 12 months 535/six, brand new P.Oxy. 1357 sixteen . The form of the newest ? thereon papyrus also is similar to the fresh new setting found in P.Ryl. III 470. The new ? within papyrus, but not, compared with P.Ryl. III 470, is written since the an ongoing page. The fresh ? inside the P.Oxy. 1357 possess good diagonal heart attack to reach the top leftover, throughout fragment P.Ryl. III 470 it is written such as for instance a great triangle. The brand new aforementioned particular this new ?, a similar sort of the fresh new ?, the above-mentioned brand of the fresh ? and you may a keen ? having likewise short shots are also available inside P.Berol 13269, that is assigned to this new 7th/8th Century 16 . P.Lond. 1817, dated on 6th century, nevertheless alternates between the uncial as well as the more than-mentioned sort of the fresh ?, and parallels into the Manchester fragment exists pertaining elite singles mobil to the ? and also the ?, once the pit between the two parts of the fresh new ? inside the P. Lond. 1817 isn’t as higher like in P.Ryl. III 470 17 . In line with the relative texts quoted, P.Ryl. III, 470 belongs involving the sixth and you may 7th centuries. This new 5th century is unlikely as day out of provider, however, can’t be entirely eliminated. The utilization of brown ink, of which there’s absolutely no facts ahead of the 4th century, along with affairs within this assistance 18 .

Bottom line it may be mentioned that a dating to your 3rd otherwise fourth century must be considered to be most not likely

thirteen. At the closes of shots out-of ?, ?, ?, ?, and you may ? was brief dots of ink that provide the text a fake, otherwise, while the Lobel place it, decorative physical appearance. For a similar sensation from inside the enchanting texts, cf. p. eight col. 17; pt ten; p. 36 col. 2; P. thirty-six Col. 7 inside the: K. Klassendanz, Papyri Graecae Magicae. Perish griechischen Zauberpapyri (=The latest Greek Enchanting Papyri) II, Stuttgart 2nd ed. 1974.

In terms of paleographic matchmaking, it ought to be noted one majuscule manuscripts, since the Roberts himself writes inside the feedback, are very tough to big date

18. I’m in financial trouble so you’re able to H. Harrauer on conversation. Get a hold of also V. Gardthausen, Griechische Palaographie 1: Das Buchwesen im Altertum und auch i will be byzantinischen Mittelalter, Leipzig second ed. 1911, 203-217. The guy writes (p.205) that in the 5th century Advertisement “a brown, plus metallic ink arrived to fool around with” and you may estimates Schubart inside perspective when you look at the mention 5 towards the exact same web page, exactly who speaks away from a brown-red-ink , that’s available throughout the papyri throughout the 4th century Post. Meanwhile, the more beneficial brown ink was only used for very important texts.